MARKERS OF JOINT ATTENTION DEFECITIS
УДК 159.9
Abstract
The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the picture of atypical joint attention on a sample of children with different forms of developmental disabilities. A comparative study of a sample of typically developing preschool children with groups of children with atypical development aged 5 to 7 years (N = 90) was performed. The situations of real interaction between the child and the adult were used, and using the eye tracking method, markers of joint attention were recorded in real time. The manifestations of the deficit of joint attention, which impedes the involvement of a child with an adult in dyadic (bilateral) interactions, are necessary for the comprehensive development and education of the child. The specificity of the functional organization of oculomotor activity as an indicator of the child’s participation in joint attention is highlighted. Markers that can reliably predict the development of joint attention deficit have been identified by eye tracking. The universal symptoms of joint attention disorders for different clinical groups are systematized.
Downloads
References
2. Baron-Cohen S. The extreme male brain theory of autism // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2002. P. 6–24
3. Charman T., Swettenham J., Baron-Cohen S., Baird G., Cox A., Drew A. Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind // Cognitive Development. 2001. Vol. 15. P. 481–498.
4. Chen C., Castellanos I., Yu C., Houston D.M. Effects of children’s hearing loss on the synchrony between parents’ object naming and children’s attention // Infant Behavior and Development. 2019. Vol. 57.
5. Dawson G., Jones E.J., Merkle K. Early behavioral intervention is associated with normalized brain activity in young children with autism // Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012. Vol. 51 (11). P. 1150–1159
6. Emery N.J. The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evaluation of social gaze // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2000. Vol. 24. P. 581–604.
7. Farroni T., Johnson M.H., Brockbank M., Simion F. Infants' use of gaze direction to cue attention: The importance of perceived motion, Visual Cognition. 2000. Vol. 7(6). P.705-718,
8. Frischen A., Bayliss A.P., Tipper S.P. Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences // Psychol Bull. 2007. Vol. 133 (4). P. 694–724.
9. Frith C.D. The social brain? // Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007. Vol. 362. P. 671–678.
10. Hobson R.P. What puts the jointness in joint attention? // Joint attention: Communication and other minds / ed. by J. Roessler. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005. P. 185–204.
11. Kretch K.S., Franchak J.M., Adolph K.E. Crawling and walking infants see the world differently // Child Dev. 2014. Vol. 85(4). P. 1503–1518.
12. Moore C., Dunham P., Hillsdale N.J. Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development // Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. P. 294.
13. Mumme D. Infants' use of gaze cues to interpret others' actions and emotional reactions / Gaze-Following: Its Development and Significance (eds.) R. Flomm, K. Lee, D. Muir, Mahwah, NJ // Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2007. P. 143–170.
14. Mundy P. A Review of Joint Attention and Social-Cognitive Brain Systems in Typical Development and Autism Spectrum Disorder // European Journal of Neuroscience. 2017. Vol. 47. 10.1111/ejn.13720.
15. Murray A., Yingling J. Competence in Language at 24 Months: Relations with Attachment Security and Home Stimulation. The Journal of genetic psychology. 2000. Vol.161. P. 133-40.
16. Ozonoff S. Components of executive function in autism and other disorders / Autism as an executive disorder (ed.) J. Russell // Oxford : Oxford University Press. 1997. P. 179–211.
17. Quinn P.C., Tanaka J.W., Lee K., Pascalis O., Slater A.M. Are Faces Special to Infants? An Investigation of Configural and Featural Processing for the Upper and Lower Regions of Houses in 3- to 7-month-olds // Vis cogn. 2013. Vol. 21(1). P. 23–37.
18. Ristic J., Kingstone A. Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition. 2005;94 Ristic J, Mottron L, Friesen CK, Iarocci G, Burack JA, Kingstone A. Eyes are special but not for everyone: The case of autism // Cognitive Brain Research. 2005. Vol. 24. P. 715–718.
19. Sibra G. Recognizing Communicative Intentions in Infancy. Mind & Language. 2010. Vol.25. P. 141 - 168.
20. Tomasello M. Joint attention as social cognition // Joint attention: Its origins and role in development // ed. by Moore C, Dunham P. Hillsdale // Lawrence Erlbaum. 1995. P. 103–130.
21. Von Suchodoletz A., Fäsche A., Skuballa I.T. The Role of Attention Shifting in Orthographic Competencies: Cross-Sectional Findings from 1st, 3rd, and 8th Grade Students // Front Psychol. Vol. 8.
Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
