INTUITION AND ITS ROLE IN THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
Abstract
Abstract. The article discusses the concept and role of intuition in scientific knowledge. The characteristic of intuition as a mode of cognition is given. The author emphasizes the role of the neural network in the process of intuition. The author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to study consciousness in order to understand the mechanisms of intuition.
Downloads
References
1. Анохин К.В. Наш разум – гиперсеть // Троицкий вариант. 2015. № 8(177). URL: https://elementy.ru/nauchno- 432594/Nash_razum_eto_giperset
2. Бунге М. Интуиция и наука : пер. с англ. М. : ПРОГРЕСС, 1967. 188 с.
3. Гейтинг А. Интуиционизм. М. : Наука, 1965. 149 с.
4. Кант И. Критика чистого разума // Кант И. Сочинения: в 6 т. М., 1964. Т. 3. С. 69–695.
5. Кант И. Критика способности суждения. М. : Изд-во «Искусство», 1994. 367 с.
6. Нагель Т. Мыслимость невозможного и проблема духа и тела // Вопросы философии. 2001. № 8. С. 101–112
7. Ожегов С.И. Словарь русского языка. М. : Русский язык, 1990. 921 с.
8. Чалмерс Д. Сознающий ум: в поисках фундаментальной теории. М. : УРСС, 2013. 512 с.
9. Фейнберг Е.Л. Научное творчество Нильса Бора // Нильс Бор. Жизнь и творчество : сб. ст. М. : Наука, 1967. С. 88–102.
10. Эйнштейн А. Собрание научных трудов: сборник научных трудов. Т. 1. М. : Наука, 1965. 702 c.
11. Ясперс К. Духовная ситуация времени. М. : АСТ, 2013. С. 288.
References:
1. Anohin K.V. Nash razum – giperset' // Troickij variant. 2015. № 8(177). URL: https://elementy.ru/nauchno- 432594/Nash_razum_eto_giperset
2. Bunge M. Intuiciya i nauka : per. s angl. M. : PROGRESS, 1967. 188 p.
3. Gejting A. Intuicionizm. M. : Nauka, 1965. 149 p.
4. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6 t. M., 1964. T. 3. P. 69–695.
5. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. M. : Izd-vo «Iskusstvo», 1994. 367 p.
6. Nagel' T. Myslimost' nevozmozhnogo i problema duha i tela // Voprosy filosofii. 2001. № 8. P. 101–112
7. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka. M. : Russkij yazyk, 1990. 921 p.
8. CHalmers D. Soznayushchij um: v poiskah fundamental'noj teorii. M. : URSS, 2013. 512 p.
9. Fejnberg E.L. Nauchnoe tvorchestvo Nil'sa Bora // Nil's Bor. ZHizn' i tvorchestvo : sb. st. M. : Nauka, 1967. P. 88–102.
10. Ejnshtejn A. Sobranie nauchnyh trudov: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. T. 1. M. : Nauka, 1965. 702 p.
11. Yаspers K. Duhovnaya situaciya vremeni. M. : AST, 2013. P. 288.
Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
