IMPACT OF HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY ON THE FORMATION OF RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
УДК 159.9
Abstract
This article discusses the model of responsible fatherhood and the possibility of influencing its formation by the principles of hegemonic masculinity. The relevance of the study is due to the need for the participation of fathers in the upbringing of children - on the one hand, and the results of studies demonstrating the cyclical refusals of fathers to take responsibility for the child - on the other. The authors of the article suggest a possible reason for the refusal of fathers from responsibility for children in the previously formed principles of masculinity. The aim of the work is to consider the phenomenon of "responsible fatherhood", highlight the qualities necessary for its implementation in modern men and study its formation through the prism of the influence of hegemonic masculinity. The paper uses theoretical methods of analysis, synthesis and systematization of information, a review of domestic and foreign research on the topic. Such concepts as paternity, responsible paternity, and hegemonic masculinity stand out for analysis. Article authors present model of responsible fatherhood. In conclusion, authors note that the previously formed principles of hegemonic masculinity in the upbringing of boys do not correspond to the modern requirements of society, as well as the need to include new principles of role behavior in the gender education of boys that are relevant to modern ideas about parenthood.
Downloads
References
Апкаева С.А., Волошко В.В. Влияние отсутствия отца на формирование личности ребенка // Смоленский медицинский альманах. 2019. № 4. С. 126–128.
Бесчасная А.А. Детство и родительство в исследованиях ВЦИОМ // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. 2021. № 3 (63). С. 58–61.
Борисенко Ю.В. Опыт применения психолого-педагогических технологий сопровождения становления психологической готовности к отцовству // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. 2019. № 3. С. 674–684.
Грентли Дик-Рид. Роды без страха. М. : Столица-принт, 2005. 304 с.
Гурко Т.А. Родительство: социологические аспекты. М. : Центр общечеловеческих ценностей, 2003. 164 С.
Залужная М.В. Программно-целевой подход в формировании ответственного отцовства // Народное образование. 2016. № 6. С. 123–127.
К он И.С. Мужская роль и гендерный порядок // Вестник общественного мнения. 2008. № 2. С. 37–41.
Кон И.С. Мужчина в меняющемся мире. М. : Время, 2009. 496 с.
Кошпаева Т.А. Влияние отца на развитие ребенка // Современные научные исследования и инновации. 2020. № 4 (108). С. 32–33.
Суковатая В.А. От «маскулинности травмы» к «маскулинности невроза»: гендерные политики в советской и постсоветской массовой культуре // Лабиринт. Журнал социально-гуманитарных исследований. 2012. № 5. С. 37–54.
Сухушина Е.В., Абрамова М.О., Рыкун А.Ю. Современные образы маскулинности // Вестник науки Сибири. 2017. № 4. С. 168–178.
Тартаковская И.Н. Гендерная социология. М. : Вариант ; Невский Простор, 2005. 368 с.
Фёдоров К. На пороге новой маскулинности: что значит быть мужчиной вне патриархальных норм // Психология и психотерапия семьи. 2020. № 3–4. С. 53–57.
Фромм Э. Искусство любить. М. : АСТ, 2020. 224 с.
Яковец М.Г., Сурженко Л.В. Представления современной молодежи о распределении ролей в семье / Наука и образование в современном мире: методология, теория и практика : межд. конф. (Чебоксары, 26 апреля 2019). Чебоксары : изд-во Негосударственное образовательное частное учреждение дополнительного профессионального образования «Экспертно-методический центр», 2019. С. 76–79.
Gurkan T., Ummanel A., Koran N.A Qualitative Study on the Perception of Fatherhood // European Journal of Educational Sciences. 2021. № 2(8). P. 42–59.
Joi B. Henry, Wrenetha A. Julion, Dawn T. Bounds. Fatherhood Matters: An Integrative Review of Fatherhood Intervention Research // The Journal of School Nursing. 2020. № 1 (36). P. 19–32.
References:
Apkaeva S.A., Voloshko V.V. Vliyanie otsutstviya otca na formirovanie lichnosti rebenka // Smolenskij medicinskij al'manah. 2019. No. 4. P. 126–128.
Beschasnaya A.A. Detstvo i roditel'stvo v issledovaniyah VCIOM // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2021. No. 3(63). P. 58–61.
Borisenko YU. V. Opyt primeneniya psihologo-pedagogicheskih tekhnologij soprovozhdeniya stanovleniya psihologicheskoj gotovnosti k otcovstvu // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019. No. 3. P. 674–684.
Gurko T. A. Roditel'stvo: sociologicheskie aspekty. M.: Centr obshchechelovecheskih cennostej, 2003. 164 p.
Grentli Dik-Rid. Rody bez straha. M.: Stolica-print, 2005. 304 p.
Zaluzhnaya M. V. Programmno-celevoj podhod v formirovanii otvetstvennogo otcovstva // Narodnoe obrazovanie. 2016. No. 6. P. 123–127.
Kon I. S. Muzhskaya rol' i gendernyj poryadok // Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. 2008. No. 2. P. 37-41.
Kon I.S. Muzhchina v menyayushchemsya mire. M.: Vremya, 2009. 496 p.
Koshpaeva T. A. Vliyanie otca na razvitie rebenka // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovacii. 2020. No. 4 (108). P. 32–33.
Sukovataya V.A. Ot «maskulinnosti travmy» k «maskulinnosti nevroza»: gendernye politiki v sovetskoj i postsovetskoj massovoj kul'ture // Labirint. ZHurnal social'no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij. 2012. No. 5. P. 37–54.
Suhushina E. V., Abramova M. O., Rykun A. YU. Sovremennye obrazy maskulinnosti // Vestnik nauki Sibiri. 2017. No. 4. P. 168–178.
Tartakovskaya I. N. Gendernaya sociologiya. M.: Variant; Nevskij Prostor, 2005. 368 p.
Fyodorov K. Na poroge novoj maskulinnosti: chto znachit byt' muzhchinoj vne patriarhal'nyh norm // Psihologiya i psihoterapiya sem'i. 2020. No. 3-4. P. 53–57.
Fromm E. Iskusstvo lyubit'. M. : AST, 2020. 224 p.
Yakovec M. G., Surzhenko L. V. Predstavleniya sovremennoj molodezhi o raspredelenii rolej v sem'e / Nauka i obrazovanie v sovremennom mire: metodologiya, teoriya i praktika: mezhd. konf. (Cheboksary, 26 aprelya 2019). CHeboksary: izd-vo Negosudarstvennoe obrazovatel'noe chastnoe uchrezhdenie dopolnitel'nogo professional'nogo obrazovaniya "Ekspertno-metodicheskij centr", 2019. P. 76–79.
Gurkan T., Ummanel A., Koran N. A Qualitative Study on the Perception of Fatherhood // European Journal of Educational Sciences. 2021. No. 2(8). P. 42–59.
Joi B. Henry, Wrenetha A. Julion, Dawn T. Bounds. Fatherhood Matters: An Integrative Review of Fatherhood Intervention Research // The Journal of School Nursing. 2020. №1 (36). P. 19–32.
Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
